{"id":636,"date":"2004-03-04T18:20:00","date_gmt":"2004-03-04T23:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/2004\/03\/04\/lj-drama\/"},"modified":"2004-03-04T18:20:00","modified_gmt":"2004-03-04T23:20:00","slug":"lj-drama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/2004\/03\/04\/lj-drama\/","title":{"rendered":"LJ Drama"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font size=+1>Note:  This is not directed at anyone in particular; it is simply my observation of the whole &#8220;serial adding&#8221; controversy.<\/font><\/p>\n<p>Serial adders are such a non-issue.  First off, anything you post on the internet &trade; is pretty much public.  You post, you&apos;re asking for a response of some kind.  Grow a thick skin, for cryin&apos; out loud.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, you have the option of locking any posts you want to.  Get a clue &#8211; if you lock a post, some one who has added you to their &#8220;friends list&#8221; <b> who you have not added back to yours<\/b> cannot read your freakin&apos; posts. What is so difficult about that concept to understand?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Oh, but every time I go to my user page I see these <i>awful<\/i> names&#8230;.&#8221;  Oh, grow the fuck up.  They can&apos;t see anything you don&apos;t allow them to see, so untwist your damn knickers.<\/p>\n<p>A serial adder added me to their list.  His\/her\/it&apos;s journal is stupid, so I ignored it.  Another serial adder who has not added me but who caused\/causes a huge uproar (<lj user=\"paedophile\">) is decidedly not boring, so I added <b>him<\/b>  I&apos;m only mildly pouting that he has not added me back.<\/p>\n<p>From my observation, it&apos;s only females who get all up in arms about serial adding &#8211; is that true?  What<i>ever<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>As long as I&apos;m being bitchy, I might as well register my irritation at the &#8220;add me I&apos;ll add you back, k?&#8221; mentality.  Logically, if everyone said that, no one would ever be added!!   &#8220;Add me and I&apos;ll add you back!&#8221;  &#8220;No &#8211; you add me and I&apos;ll add <i>you<\/i> back!&#8221;   Glah.  I hated junior high when I was <i>there<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, LJ is deciding what, if anything, to do about friend&apos;s lists.  Here&apos;s the link &#8211; http:\/\/www.livejournal.com\/users\/news\/76866.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Note: This is not directed at anyone in particular; it is simply my observation of the whole &#8220;serial adding&#8221; controversy. Serial adders are such a non-issue. First off, anything you post on the internet &trade; is pretty much public. You post, you&apos;re asking for a response of some kind. Grow a thick skin, for cryin&apos; out loud. Secondly, you have the option of locking any posts you want to. Get a clue &#8211; if you lock a post, some one who has added you to their &#8220;friends list&#8221; who you have not added back to yours cannot read your freakin&apos; posts. What is so difficult about that concept to understand? &#8220;Oh, but every time I go to my user page I see these awful names&#8230;.&#8221; Oh, grow the fuck up. They can&apos;t see anything you don&apos;t allow them to see, so untwist your damn knickers. A serial adder added me to their list. His\/her\/it&apos;s journal is stupid, so I ignored it. Another serial adder who has not added me but who caused\/causes a huge uproar () is decidedly not boring, so I added him I&apos;m only mildly pouting that he has not added me back. From my observation, it&apos;s only females who get all up in arms about serial adding &#8211; is that true? Whatever. As long as I&apos;m being bitchy, I might as well register my irritation at the &#8220;add me I&apos;ll add you back, k?&#8221; mentality. Logically, if everyone said that, no one would ever be added!! &#8220;Add me and I&apos;ll add you back!&#8221; &#8220;No &#8211; you add me and I&apos;ll add you back!&#8221; Glah. I hated junior high when I was there. Anyway, LJ is deciding what, if anything, to do about friend&apos;s lists. Here&apos;s the link &#8211; http:\/\/www.livejournal.com\/users\/news\/76866.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=636"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/636\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/robandjen.com\/jen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}